Our Next Happy Hour

  • No dates present

Event Calendar

February 2012
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829EC

Yes, Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme and not Manna from Heaven

I have seen several statist journalists criticize Texas governor and GOP presidential hopeful Rick Perry for referring to Social Security as a “Ponzi scheme” in his book “Fed Up!”

There are many things for which to criticize Perry, but the Ponzi scheme comment is not among them. Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. That this is an unusual notion to those that worship at the altar of the New Deal demonstrates the statist commitment to faith in government over actual facts about government. This faith in government rivals that of Billy Graham’s faith in Jesus, but without a virgin birth.
Make no mistake, the Cult of the New Deal is comprised of Republicans and Democrats, “conservatives” and “progressives.” For example, none of the current GOP field of presidential contenders has any intent on ending this fraud. That would make them apostates, and unelectable. And if you are unelectable, you can not get a prime sucking location at the head table at the Banquet of the Holy Government Teat
Apparently, if the prophet FDR said there was a trust fund, then by God there is a trust fund! But, unfortunately, there is not. FDR makes Bernie Madoff look like a penny ante amateur. And just like the victims of Madoff’s fraud, lots of people are going to lose lots of money. FDR’s fraud, however, affects far more than those personally duped by his lies. It affects everyone in the country, and will for generations.
Perhaps the most devout members of the Cult of the New Deal can be persuaded by the words of their deity, the benevolent federal government. According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (just one of thousands of federal tentacles attached to the Vishnu of the State) a Ponzi scheme is
an investment fraud that involves the payment of purported returns to existing investors from funds contributed by new investors. Ponzi scheme organizers often solicit new investors by promising to invest funds in opportunities claimed to generate high returns with little or no risk. In many Ponzi schemes, the fraudsters focus on attracting new money to make promised payments to earlier-stage investors and to use for personal expenses, instead of engaging in any legitimate investment activity.

Social Security takes money from those currently working to pay off those no longer working. One would be hard pressed to come up with a better example of a Ponzi scheme. Except, of course, what the benevolent federal deity does is worse. A mere mortal charlatan must convince those with money to voluntarily part with it. The benevolent deity need not concern itself with such a pedestrian task. It simply takes the money from the victim before the victim ever gets to see it.
Reject the Church of the State. Reject fraudulent Ponzi schemes perpetuated in the name of benevolence. Reject the false prophets that preach only the State can provide bounty for its parishioners. Reject the fantasy.
Embrace freedom. Embrace reality. Freedom is dangerous and reality is scary, but pretending we live in a land where fraud is benevolence is fantasy.

FDR and the legacy of his malignant “Second Bill of Rights”


Franklin Delano Roosevelt was one of the most successful presidents in our history. This is unfortunate.


His vision of a government that could provide bounty to all is fanciful. Far worse, it is malignant. And it lives on today as strong as ever.


One may assume FDR had good intentions. But we all know what paves the road to hell, or, in our case, the road to serfdom.


FDR’s version of utopia was laid out in his State of the Union address on January 11, 1944.


In this speech, he lays out a “Second Bill of Rights,” which include:


The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights, no matter how well-intentioned, have disastrous results.


Let us look at just one: “The right of every family to a decent home.”


If such a right were to exist, then every family would have the right to demand it.


If they have the right to demand it, then someone has the obligation to provide it.


If someone has the obligation to provide it, that person MUST provide it. What if they don’t? Then the government must use force to make the person provide it.


The result is not freedom. It is the opposite.


And this is perfectly acceptable to FDR and the “progressives” he has spawned.