Liberty on the Rocks™ Denver

A Grassroots Freedom Movement

“Party over person?” Not according to Brown, Beauprez and Andrews.

David K. Williams, Jr. | September 2, 2010

Hopefully, Mike Rosen’s utterly absurd “party over person” mantra can be put to rest.

Rosen and other GOP apologists have recited the line like a Buddhist koan.
Now that highly respected Republican patriarchs are calling for their duly nominated gubernatorial candidate, Dan Maes, to step down, will Rosen cling to his mantra like Louise clinging to the steering wheel in her final scene with Thelma?
First, former Senator Hank Brown withdrew his endorsement, and declared “I’m beginning to find that (Maes’) explanations are not adequate.” Brown is now “looking around” for a candidate to support.
Then former Congressman Bob Beauprez advised that “If Dan really is committed to doing the best for Colorado, as well as for the GOP, he ought to take serious inventory and see if this isn’t the time to do the noble thing.”
Now former Colorado Senate President John Andrews has declared that “[a]s a conscientious Republican who earlier voted for Dan, I cannot support a manifestly unfit nominee.” He said he will write in Jane Norton.
These respected Republicans have rejected the laughable “party over person” mantra. All principled people – regardless of political affiliation – should reject it.
I applaud and respect Brown, Beauprez and Andrews for their rejection of the mantra. However, I believe Dan Maes should abide by HIS principles and stay in the race. He won the GOP nomination fair and square. He worked hard to earn the nod. He has overcome numerous obstacles to attain the nomination. He played by ALL the rules.
He should make the GOP accept reality and ignore those calling for him to quit.

BlueCarp

Category: "party over person", Bob Beauprez, Colorado GOP, Colorado Governor race, Dan Maes, Hank Brown, John Andrews, PPC | Comments Off
Tags:

Refuse to eat entrails.

David K. Williams, Jr. | September 1, 2010

Imagine that the government mandated that everyone, from the age of 18 to death, only had two choices for dinner: tripe or chitlins. I think most of us would rise up and fight such a ridiculous situation. However, when it comes to the electoral process, we happily accept it as “just the way it is.”
Refuse the false choices.
Reject a ridiculous situation.
Starting now.

BlueCarp

Category: PPC, electoral process | Comments Off
Tags:

GOP complaints against Tancredo.

David K. Williams, Jr. | August 29, 2010

I thought competition was a GOP principle. Or does that only apply to school choice? If the current voting system makes Tancredo’s third party run problematic for the GOP, the GOP should champion a new voting system. I suggest Approval Voting. I recommend “Gaming the Vote” by William Poundstone as an excellent primer on the issue.


Don’t make the election rules then complain when others play by them.

Let freedom ring.

BlueCarp

Category: Colorado GOP, PPC, Tom Tancredo, competition | Comments Off
Tags:

Freedom ain’t a la carte.

David K. Williams, Jr. | August 29, 2010

According to the New York Time’s article on Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally in D.C. (see “At Lincoln Memorial, a call for religious rebirth“):

. . . Tea Party groups have said they want to focus on fiscal conservatism and not risk alienating people by talking about religion or social issues . . .

To the extent this is true, it is a fatal flaw.
Tea Parties – indeed, all proclaimed believers in small government – should be about freedom. Economic freedom. Social freedom. To only address half of that equation is problematic.
It is the equivalent of saying, “yes, you should have the freedom to spend your money any way you wish, but, no, you should not be able to conduct your private life any way you wish.”
The inconsistency is obvious.

BlueCarp

Category: Glenn Beck, PPC, Restoring Honor, freedom | Comments Off
Tags:

Progressives think you are mean.

David K. Williams, Jr. | August 25, 2010

Michael Gerson, of the Washington Post, demonstrates how “progressive” statists feel about their fellow man:

“Social Security abolition would push perhaps 13 million elderly Americans into destitution.”

(See “Why the Tea Party is toxic for the GOP.”)

Gerson, and statists like him, think so little of the American people that he believes we would let 13 million Americans starve to death in the streets if the government did not compel us to subsidize Social Security. Statists of all stripe believe that humanity is base, immoral, greedy, heartless and cold.

Statists believe that but for the enlightened ones, like them, making us all commit “good deeds” through government force, we’d callously step over dying old folks in the street on the way to our jobs on Wall Street.

I’m sure Gerson sees us all twirling our moustaches as we laughed at dying old ladies in alley ways.

Libertarians know that if we didn’t have to pay 14% of our income toward Social Security, there would be fewer destitute elderly people; there would be more private money to assist the remaining destitute; and that there is no worse tyranny than forcing someone to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it is good for him.

BlueCarp

Category: Michael Gerson, PPC, Washington Post, progressives, statists | Comments Off
Tags:

Bad eggs = more government.

David K. Williams, Jr. | August 23, 2010

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”

–Rahm Emanuel
Rahm wasn’t thinking big enough. A crisis doesn’t have to be serious to take advantage of it.
Obama’s Food and Drug Administration Commissioner, Margaret Hamburg, is taking advantage of some bad eggs that have made some people sick. Of course, to any statist, bad eggs means the government needs more involvement in the egg production process.
Of course she did.

BlueCarp

Category: Government Incompetence, Mary Hamburg, PPC, Rahm Emanuel | Comments Off
Tags:

Jonah Goldberg and “right” vs. “left.”

David K. Williams, Jr. | August 23, 2010

In his excellent book “Liberal Fascism,” Jonah Goldberg writes

The popular conception that Hitler was a man of the right is grounded in a rich complex of assumptions and misconceptions about what constitutes left and right, terms that get increasingly slippery the more you try to nail them down.

(page 56).
This is true precisely because the terms are meaningless. Fascism, Communism, Nazism, Socialism, monarchism, and totalitarianism in any form ALL subjugate the individual to a false “greater good” of the “people” or the “collective.”
They all push the ideology that the state is greater than the person. And that ideology is evil.
Whether or not the state is perceived to be “left” or “right” is only as important as which hand holds the gun to your head. Once the trigger is pulled, it doesn’t matter which hand did the pulling.

BlueCarp

Category: Jonah Goldberg, Left vs Right, Liberal Fascism, PPC | Comments Off
Tags:

One tentacle of the Leviathan is no better than another.

David K. Williams, Jr. | August 21, 2010

A friend argued that I could take my ideological “purity all the way to [my] economic prison.”

She believes that my refusal to join the GOP will lead us to this metaphorical “prison.”
She fails to see we are already incarcerated. I think most reasonable people would agree the Democrats are not solely responsible for our obscenely bloated federal government. Many Republicans – and all of the honest ones – admit their culpability.
“This time, however,” they always say, “things will be different.” They want “just ONE more last chance.” Because, “this time” they “really MEAN it.”
As Big Government Republican George W. Bush said, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice…. you can’t get fooled again.” On this occasion I agree with W.
We are already in my friend’s metaphoric “economic prison.” One built jointly by the Republicans and Democrats. One built with your her approval. One built on the false belief that one tentacle of the Leviathan is better than the other.
One that can not stand without her – and our – consent.
Withdraw your consent. We are saving you all at a seat at the table.

BlueCarp

Category: Leviathan, PPC | Comments Off
Tags:

Dan Maes, Tambor Williams and all that is wrong with politics…

David K. Williams, Jr. | August 20, 2010

According to the Denver Post, Dan Maes, GOP nominee for Colorado Governor, is defending Tambor Williams as his choice for Lt. Governor. (See “Maes tries to ease supporters’ anxiety over running mate“).

Williams has been criticized, among other things, for her support of Refs C & D when she was a member of Bill Owens’ cabinet. Maes sent an email to supporters addressing those concerns.
According to the Post, Maes’
“… e-mail says Williams, as a Cabinet member under then-Gov. Bill Owens, privately opposed the referendums but had to support them publicly because her boss did.”

This type of attitude is the problem. Tambor Williams is just one example of thousands. It is not fair to single her out. She is just another career politician, assimilated into party politics, where party unity is subservient to truth and principle.
If one does not believe in something, but publicly espouses it for private gain, that person is a hypocrite. Or perhaps a liar. Such conduct should not be excused in the name of political expediency.
If a person is asked to support a position contrary to one’s beliefs, a person of principle says, “no, I will not compromise my principles for your political gain.” A resignation should then be offered.
We, as an electorate, accept this unprincipled conduct. We get what we deserve: unprincipled politicians.

BlueCarp

Category: Dan Maes, PPC, Referendum C, Referendum D, Tambor Williams, politics, principals | Comments Off
Tags:

Leadership Program of the Rockies – apply now.

David K. Williams, Jr. | August 20, 2010

Even established, successful leaders can learn more and meet new, emerging leaders they otherwise would never know. The time and money invested in the program pays off quickly and the dividends last decades.

Deadline for nominations and applications is August 31, 2010. You can apply online at LeadershipProgram.org
As a 2009 graduate and the Chair of the Libertarian Party of Colorado, I can assure those sympathetic to the small government movement that the LPR is not part of the GOP machine. It is about ideas and principles and leadership. There are speakers from across the center-right. Yes, there are neocons, but there are also speakers from the libertarian Cato Institute and the objectivist Ayn Rand Institute. The class members are just as diverse.
I highly recommend it.

BlueCarp

Category: Ayn Rand Institute, Cato Institute, LPR, Libertarian Party, Objectivist, PPC, neocon | Comments Off
Tags:

Next Page »